On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:
Enter any text. Translation will be done by artificial intelligence technology.
This tool enables you to refine the text you composed in a non-native language.
It also produces excellent results when processing text translated by artificial intelligence.
This tool allows you to create a summary of text in any language.
Enter a small fragment of text, and artificial intelligence will expand it.
Enter any text. Speech will be generated by artificial intelligence.
Enter a verb in any language. The system will provide a conjugation table for the verb in all possible tenses.
Enter any question in free form in any language.
You can enter detailed queries from several sentences. For example:
In denotational semantics and domain theory, power domains are domains of nondeterministic and concurrent computations.
The idea of power domains for functions is that a nondeterministic function may be described as a deterministic set-valued function, where the set contains all values the nondeterministic function can take for a given argument. For concurrent systems, the idea is to express the set of all possible computations.
Roughly speaking, a power domain is a domain whose elements are certain subsets of a domain. Taking this approach naively, though, often gives rise to domains that don't quite have the desired properties, and so one is led to increasingly complicated notions of power domain. There are three common variants: the Plotkin, upper, and lower power domains. One way to understand these concepts is as free models of theories of nondeterminism.
For most of this article we use the terms "domain" and "continuous function" quite loosely, meaning respectively some kind of ordered structure and some kind of limit-preserving function. This flexibility is genuine; for example, in some concurrent systems it is natural to impose the condition that every message sent must eventually be delivered. However, the limit of a chain of approximations in which a message was not delivered, would be a completed computation in which the message was never delivered!
A modern reference to this subject is the chapter of Abramsky and Jung [1994]. Older references include those of Plotkin [1983, Chapter 8] and Smyth [1978].